Tag Archives | Fox News

Fox News Hypes the Resignation of a Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Over Global Warming

Fox News hypes the resignation of one single (albeit a one time Nobel Prize winning) physicist from the American Physical Society (APS) because he disagreed with one single phrase in the official statement from the society regarding climate change.

Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Resigns Over Global Warming | Fox News.

This is much ado about nothing.

But Fox and now the denial blogosphere will make a big deal of this as part of their partisan effort to try and sow public doubt about global warming theory pushing the denial meme that climate scientists are still debating the science. (Hint, no they aren’t, the science is settled)

Interestingly Fox while emphasizing that the scientist, Dr. Ivar Giaever, was a Nobel Prize winner makes no mention that Drs. Leo Esaki and Brian D. Josephson, who won the Nobel Prize with him are part of the 100 Nobel Laureates Warn Our Planet! effort as signatories behind this statement:

The most profound danger to world peace in the coming years will stem not from the irrational acts of states or individuals but from the legitimate demands of the world’s dispossessed. Of these poor and disenfranchised, the majority live a marginal existence in equatorial climates. Global warming, not of their making but originating with the wealthy few, will affect their fragile ecologies most. Their situation will be desperate and manifestly unjust.

It cannot be expected, therefore, that in all cases they will be content to await the beneficence of the rich. If then we permit the devastating power of modern weaponry to spread through this combustible human landscape, we invite a conflagration that can engulf both rich and poor. The only hope for the future lies in co-operative international action, legitimized by democracy.

It is time to turn our backs on the unilateral search for security, in which we seek to shelter behind walls. Instead, we must persist in the quest for united action to counter both global warming and a weaponized world.

These twin goals will constitute vital components of stability as we move toward the wider degree of social justice that alone gives hope of peace.

Some of the needed legal instruments are already at hand, such as the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the Convention on Climate Change, the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaties and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. As concerned citizens, we urge all governments to commit to these goals that constitute steps on the way to replacement of war by law.

To survive in the world we have transformed, we must learn to think in a new way. As never before, the future of each depends on the good of all.

Months ago you might recall (actually probably not because it was pretty insignificant too) that the denial blogosphere was all abuzz with the news that the Dr. Harold Lewis had resigned from APS over pretty much the same thing, a general disagreement over the official APS position regarding global warming and APS chose to issue a statement on Lewis’s comments as he resigned (APS Comments on Harold Lewis’ Resignation of his Society Membership). Dr. Lewis apparently thought that the Climategate non scandal was a big deal and threw a hissy fit over the APS’s non attention to the matter.

The whole event was seen by the climate science community as much ado about nothing at the time and I will expect the response amongst the professionals that matter will be the same this time too. As for the APS we will just have to wait and see if they have anything to say about Dr. Giaever’s resignation.

Comments { 0 }

A Call For Scepticism

Collin Maessen, in a great new blog and YouTube Channel I just discovered just today, makes a devatingly critcal video exposing both the "faux" scientific journals that are out there and the hippocracy and phoney intellectual rigor that goes on on the part of the climate denial website WattsUpWithThat.com, Chris Horner, and James Dellingpole

Maessen finishes his video with a great admonition…

"…Skepticism doesn’t start with the viewpoints and claims of others and being skeptical about those doesn’t make you a skeptic. Being a skeptic starts with examining YOUR own viewpoints, the positions YOU hold, and the claims YOU make, and the quality of the evidence YOU use for those. If you are not doing that like the people behind the blog Whats Up With That then you can’t call yourself a true skeptic."

I could ‘t agree more.

Be sure to visit and subscribe to Collin Maessen’s blog and his YouTube Channel.

Comments { 0 }

Bill O’Reilly on the question 'Where Did It All Come From?'

Wow! Only just the other day we learned about how Bill O’Reilly dug himself a deep deep hole and then jumped into it when he made his now infamous proclamation that "tide goes in, tide goes out, never a miscommunication." and that is his proof that there is a God and he has dug himself another deeper one and jumped into this one head first.

For those that missed his jumping in that first hole lets look at Stephen Colbert’s take on that:

The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Bill O’Reilly Proves God’s Existence – Neil deGrasse Tyson
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog</a> Video Archive

If that humiliation wasn’t enough Bill O’Reilly wanting to remove all and any doubts we may have that he’s a pompous irrational gas bag he then digs himself a deeper and wider hole and dives in head first when he publishes this little video on his YouTube channel:

O’Reilly reads a letter from a viewer and responds:

David Bevely Hills, Florida

"What do you mean when you refer to the tides when you are asked about the existence of God? Science explains the tides… the moon’s gravity pull on the oceans. "

Okay How did the moon get there?

How did the moon get there?

Look you pinheads who attack me for this, you guys are just desperate.

How did the moon get there?

How did the sun get there?

How’d it get there?

Can you explain that to me?

How come we have that and Mars doesn’t have that? Venus doesn’t have that. How come? Why not?

How’d it get here?

How did that little amoeba get here? Crawl out there? How’d it do it?

Come on.

You have order in this universe. You have an order in the universe.

Tide comes in, tide goes out.

Okay yeah, the moon does it, fine. How did the moon get there? Who put it there? Did it just happen?

Okay if we have existence if we have life on earth how come they don’t have it on the other planets?

We’re we just lucky? Some meteor just do this? Come on…

You know I see this stuff as desperate as I have said many times it takes more faith to not believe and to this that this was all luck. All this human body the intricacies of it and everything else all luck that it does to believe in the (a) deity.

There ya go."

If that isn’t laughable enough as the video segment closes out you get a still screen that reads:

Yeah,… if you want more of this anti science creationist idiocy you can pay for it.

One of my favorite science writers and popularizers (a la the late Carl Sagan) is Phil Plait who write the Bad Astronomy blog for Discover and he’s written a great take down of this Bill O’Reilly nonsense called Bill O’Reilly: tidal bore that I can highly recommend and read the comments there too. They’re a hoot.

But its a bit ironic but just before I discovered this most recent bit of Bill O’Reilly blather I watched this great little video from AntiCitzenX called The Black Box of Empirical Falsification that O’Reilly really needs to watch.

In his accompanying video notes AntiCitzenX writes:

"A nice metaphor for how empiricism and falsification work to build knowledge. It is also a nice explanation of the fundamental reasons why William Lane Craig is an idiot.

I may not be a professional philosopher, but I am a professional scientist. I do not claim that this metaphor is perfect, but it does illustrate the problem of claiming certainty about things you cannot even subject to testing."

He could have just as easily have written "It is also a nice explanation of the fundamental reasons why Bill O’Reilly is an idiot"

Bill O’Reilly is 1000% cocksure he knows exactly what the content of the box in the video is.


And just for fun if you haven’t seen enough of Bill O’Reilly taking like an idiot be sure to watch: O’Reilly on Hawking too.

Comments { 0 }

More on the Fox News, Megyn Kelly, Nazi References Debate

Just how easy is it to find Fox News personalities (and management) slurring Progessives and Liberals with Nazi comparisons?

Maybe too easy?

Lets again ask Jon Stewart.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
24 Hour Nazi Party People
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog</a> The Daily Show on Facebook
Comments { 0 }

Megyn Kelly: Just who is she really kidding?

I try to watch Fox from time to time just to see if they are making any strides to real fair and honest you decide journalism instead of the being just the right wings talking points video blog so the other day I actually caught this bit where an overly self righteous and obviously either dangerously naive or outright partisan Megyn Kelly says that Fox news personalities don’t use Nazi references in describing President Obama, Democrats, and progressives.

When democratic strategist Richard Socarides* made the claim:

"If we want to get into who is heating this and overheating this, I mean every night on the very network we’re on right now, the leading commentators on this network use this kind of language,"

Kelly replied in what I perceived as a somewhat sanctimonious tone:

"That’s not true, Richard, I don’t know if you sit and watch our programming every night, but I watch it every day, and you’re wrong."

Just who is she frickin kidding?

Almost soon as I stated to search through Google to build my own collection of evidence of nazi references by Fox personalities to rebut her claim I found I wasn’t at all alone in spotting just how absurd Kelly was with her proclamation.

Right off the bat Media Matters gives us all a list of Fox commentators using Nazi analogies that we can compare against her statement: Fox’s Kelly Absurdly Claims Fox Personalities Do Not Invoke Nazis.

…and then as for all those other folks and blogs that also recognized how ridiculous her claim was here are a few:

And there is plenty more where all that came from.

My point is,…are all of us wrong?

Let’s look at that short video of Jon Stewart’s: Bill O’Reilly Defends His Nazi Analogies

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Bill O’Reilly Defends His Nazi Analogies
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog</a> The Daily Show on Facebook
Comments { 0 }
FireStats icon Powered by FireStats